In the early 1970's, a computer science and mathematics professor named Donald Knuth started writing a large book. His book was going to be a comprehensive, 6-volume treatise on the mathematical foundations of computer programming. The title: The Art of Computer Programming. After he finished the first two volumes, he sent the manuscript to the publisher to be typeset. When he received the typeset proofs of his documents, he was disappointed with the results. The formulæ, type styles, and layout were ugly. The publisher told him that their typesetting was the best that the current technology could manage.
So Professor Knuth decided to take some time to write a program to do a better job at text formatting. He was especially interested in formating math formulæ correctly. After outlining the design goals, he estimated that he'd need about 18 months for the project. Eight years later, Knuth finished his text formatting system. He called it TEX , pronounced tech. In addition to TEX , Knuth also wrote a program called for designing typefaces. He reformatted the first two volumes of the Art of Computer Programming with TEX , and he published these volumes as second editions. He also published a 5-volume set of books about the TEX and systems.
Knuth set out to do TEX right. By many accounts, he did. TEX formats complex, intricate math formulæ beautifully, and plain text also looks excellent. Knuth paid lots of attention to the spacing between letters, symbols, and words. Many professional publishers use TEX as their typesetting system of choice, and virtually all publishers use TEX for mathematical typesetting.
If you have heard of TEX , then you have probably also heard of LATEX .
LATEX is actually written in TEX ; it is a collection of macros
that another mathematician named Leslie Lamport wrote. The main design goal
of LATEX was to provide text formatting commands for the logical
structure of documents. For example, LATEX includes commands for
formatting titles, lists, theorems, and chapters. Instead of specifying
that the text of a theorem should be italicized, numbered, and indented, a
LATEX user simply marks the text of a theorem with the LATEX command
\theorem. LATEX knows how
theorems should be formatted, so the user doesn't have to. LATEX knows
how to format books, reports, articles, letters, and other document types.
A LATEX user only needs to know how to tell LATEX what logical role
various of pieces of text play in the document. This abstraction helps with
speed, consistency, and flexibility in document formatting.
TEX has variously been described as:
All of these are true to a degree. But they all fall short of the mark:
TEX is designed to typeset professional quality documents.TEX 's job is to translate the text you type into a beautiful typeset page. This may include using multiple fonts and complex mathematics, while ensuring:
Note that TEX is a text processor, not a word processor, which means that you have to type the text in one file, compile it using TEX , and then print or preview the output.
The development cycle of a TEX document is slower than using a word processor because you have to type, compile, preview, correct until you are done. However the advantages of TEX more than make up for this apparent loss of time.
However there is more. Once you have your document can you print it out somewhere else? The answer is yes. Here are some of TEX 's advantages in the bigger picture:
TEX is a rendering in capitals of the Greek letters
; pronounced properly,
TEX rhymes with ``blecchhh,'' as in the ch in the Scottish
loch or German ach, or as in the Spanish j or Russian
kh. The name comes from the Greek root ``
'' for
words such as ``technical'' and is meant to emphasize that the printing of
mathematical texts is an integral part of the program. The proper spelling
in typewriter-like fonts is TeX and not TEX or
tex.
|
cmr
What Every Young Mathematician Should
Know
BY DR. S. ELF RIGHTEOUS
ABSTRACT: We evaluate an interesting definite
integral.
The purpose of this paper is to call attention to a result of which many mathematicians seem to be ignorant.
Theorem 1
The value of
is
Proof.
We have
|